For example:
For example:
Logie successfully analysed previously completed testing and also carried out her own testing (formative and summative) to identify the focus student’s main areas of need. Using this information, she developed individual learning goals for the students IEP, which were also integrated in the goals set for each session. Logie made a connection between the goals and the curriculum. This allowed the student to have more exposure to the targeted skills whilst seeing the relevance of the teaching that was occurring in the sessions. Logie kept a record of the students work completed in each lesson and appropriately evaluated their achievement against the learning outcomes. Logie provided students with relevant feedback that was timely, constructive and positive.
For example:
For example:
For example:
Please indicate above the relevent communication compentencies demonstrated by the student.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Logie was familiar with the assistive technology we use at school (Roger pen, Sound Field Towers and the Streamline Mic). She was good at ensuring teachers were using them correctly in the mainstream classes. Logie successfully carried out the Ling 6 Sound checklist, ensuring that she checked both left and right devices separately as well as together. She also ensured that the students listening skills were tested at varying distances. Logie noticed when one of the Mainstream Teachers was wearing the students FM device incorrectly (under their jumper) and was able to rectify this. Logie was good at interpreting Audiograms and used this information when developing student learning goals. Logie was able to make connections between the students hearing ability and grammatical/ speech errors.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Logie reflected on her teaching practice at the end of each session. She took on board feedback from other professionals to enhance her teaching practice. Logie was eager to engage with staff from both the partner school and St Mary’s. She observed a number of classes within both schools and engaged in conversation with all staff members. Logie offered her expertise in discussing suitable adjustments to classroom teachers. She also observed a number of Speech Therapy Sessions whereby she was able to discuss various tests and strategies presented during these sessions.
Overall, Logie has demonstrated a high quality of professionalism during her placement. She worked collaboratively at all times with the St Mary’s staff. She worked with Deaf/ Hard of Hearing students from years 8-11. She was involved in carrying out Individual sessions as well as supporting the students in class. After performing pre-tests, Logie designed and taught a needs based, well-structured program for the student. The skills focused on in each lesson were enhanced by clear instructions and well prepared activities. Logie was able to cater well for individual differences and managed daily interruptions in an adaptive manner. Lessons were thoroughly planned, well-paced, offered good guidance and each activity flowed nicely into each other. Logie had a good pace and language level for the students taught. She followed the strategy of I do, we do, you do, which gave the student an opportunity to see the skills being modeled, to then have a go at applying the skills and receiving feedback to improve future efforts. Logie developed a nice rapport with the students, especially given the restricted amount of time.
Do you consider that the Student is at risk of failing to achieve “Graduate level” by the end of their overall Practicum experience? No