For example:
For example:
Cheryl was able to incorporate IEP goals into her integrated lessons while identifying the suitable level of instruction. Her lesson outcomes supported the progress of the IEP goals and were embedded into natural learning situations targeted at the students learning level. The goals were continuously monitored throughout the lesson with formative assessment and explicit feedback. These observations were then transferred to future lesson outcomes to consolidate concepts. Cheryl used a Success Criteria exit slip to gain an informal formative assessment, linking the criteria to the scaffold that was used during the lesson and the learning intentions.
For example:
For example:
For example:
Please indicate above the relevent communication compentencies demonstrated by the student.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Cheryl was able to check students HAT to make sure it was operational including changing batteries and syncing WCD. She was eager to learn about unfamiliar technology e.g. Roger hearing hub and used this knowledge in future lessons. Cheryl was able to communicate with classroom teachers the importance of the students assistive technology, was constantly aware of monitoring WCD use and students access to other technology e.g. closed captions.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Cheryl incorporated the key elements of What Works Best pedagogy (high expectations, explicit teaching, effective feedback, use of data to inform practice, assessment, classroom management and wellbeing and collaboration) while concentrating on the focus areas of audition, language speech/sign, cognition and social emotional. Cheryl used explicit teaching strategies to clearly show students what to do and how to do it. She gave clear learning intentions for each lesson and used success criteria to give feedback. During the practicum Cheryl used recent journal articles from Deafness and Education International to plan and program lessons based on literacy activities.
Throughout the practicum Cheryl maintained a high professional standard with all parents, schools, teachers and students. She was very eager to integrate new strategies into her pedagogy. Cheryl was able to establish learning abilities and styles to each student on case load and use this information in her lesson planning and programming. She was involved in all areas of ISTH duties; LSTM, 1:1 lessons, group work, in class support and team teaching. Cheryl was able to integrate herself into busy classrooms without interruption and earn the respect of the other professionals that she supported i.e. classroom teachers. Cheryl consistently identified the lesson goal/outcome to all students at the beginning of each session. This set clear learning intentions enabling students to clearly understand their learning path. Success criteria’s were used as positive markers of achievement for the learning intentions. The students were continually given explicit feedback about their progress during the session. Cheryl collaborated well with others staff members explaining the needs of the students and adjustments to be made during lessons.
It has been an absolute pleasure to have Cheryl as a student. Her professionalism and enthusiasm for the job has been a breathe of fresh air and a reminder for me of what a fabulous job we have.
Do you consider that the Student is at risk of failing to achieve “Graduate level” by the end of their overall Practicum experience? No