For example:
For example:
Ms Pearson was well organised and aware of student goals and ILPs. She was mindful of all students expectations and would teach at and extend beyond their current level of understanding whilst building on the students current knowledge bank. During the data lessons students had individual expectations as 3 different levels of mathematical outcomes were targeted. The student working at ES1 was expected to identify and count by ones the data to be represented, be able to identify the groups with the most and least. The students working at Y1 were developing their understanding of tally marks and identifying the difference between group quantities. Whilst the Y2 students were expected to record their data independently using tally marks, count their tally marks by 5 and answer more complex questions relating to the data. Ms Pearson worked well with all the students and the SLSO to ensure the students were working towards these goals. The students were able to demonstrate that these goals had been met and were working towards mastery of these skill for independent practice.
For example:
For example:
For example:
Please indicate above the relevent communication compentencies demonstrated by the student.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Ms Pearson engaged with various technology used in the classroom including cochlear implants processors, hearing aids, BAHA and mini BAHA as well as FM transmitters, receivers and loops. She was aware if devices were not functioning and assisted students if their device battery was flat by changing it. Other than a flat battery, few opportunities arise throughout the year that require trouble shooting. Ms Pearson asked relevant questions regarding less familiar technology eg BAHA.
For example:
For example:
For example:
For example:
Ms Pearson collaborated with classroom staff eg teacher and SLSOs, to ensure the best outcome for the students during class activities and outside in the playground. She willingly drew on expertise and recommendations from outside agencies such as speech therapists to adjust her teaching and student learning. Ms Pearson spoke of her areas of improvement in her teaching and reflected on this, where she tried to address them in following lessons. Due to the short timeframe and being her first placement, opportunity to critic and monitor this was limited. However I believe that Ms Pearson would endeavour to address any areas for improvement that arise as she gains greater confidence in her knowledge and skills. Ms Pearson has demonstrated a high level of understanding of the needs for children with hearing impairments and would be able to advocate for these students to ensure that the necessary adjustments would be implemented to support the students' learning and educational outcomes in any setting.
Ms Pearson readily engaged with staff, including the classroom teacher and class SLSOs as well as school staff during multiclass activities such as sports and in the staffroom. She listened to and incorporated recommendations from outside agencies into the students' learning. Ms Pearson was not able to demonstrate her engagement with parents and carers as the students are transported to school, however she always spoke professionally to all staff, community members and external agencies. She was supportive to the classroom students and developed a good repour with students from the mainstream classes and the other support classes. Ms Pearson's positive attitude and professional skills add to her ability to identify the students needs and how to best address them. I wish Ms Pearson all the very best for her future career working with students that are hearing impaired and deaf.
Do you consider that the Student is at risk of failing to achieve “Graduate level” by the end of their overall Practicum experience? No